Global Finance at Risk: the Case for International Regulation: John Eatwell, Lance Taylor
Since the collapse of the Bretton Woods system in 1971 and subsequent free-float of currencies, the capital markets have been deregulated. But the benefits of international liberalization, according to John Eatwell and Lance Taylor in their boldly argued Global Finance at Risk, “have been tarnished by considerable costs”–namely, more volatile foreign exchange and domestic interest rates, a greater susceptibility to contagion, and the threat of destabilizing financial crises.
The problem with the current network of regulatory authorities, write the authors (Eatwell is president of Queens’ College at Cambridge University and a member of Britain’s House of Lords, and Taylor is a professor of economics at the New School in New York), is they offer too little, too late and just don’t manage the threat of systemic risk. To rectify this hole in the soul of the capital markets, they propose (some might say fancifully) a World Financial Authority, to be built on the back of the Bank for International Settlements, which would spearhead and manage international capital-market regulation, make policy, oversee the markets, and provide an enforcement mechanism as necessary. The authors don’t fuss: their superregulator would supervise all markets. They make the further case, very much against the current grain in OECD countries, for restrictions on short-term capital inflows to developing countries during time of crisis and for the “management” of foreign exchange rates between the U.S. dollar, euro, and yen.
Along the way, Eatwell and Taylor recap (at times controversially) various financial crises over the last 30 years and cover hot-button issues ranging from moral hazard, regulatory arbitrage, and value-at-risk modeling to the risks posed by the increasing complexity of derivatives and the need for greater international accounting standardization. The book does not discuss the Basel Committee’s newly proposed capital adequacy framework or the structural changes altering the markets as a result of electronic trading. These omissions, however, don’t detract from the authors’ feisty argument that the international financial markets–with their “remorseless dynamism” and destabilizing prospect of contagion–need activist leadership rather than mere babysitting. –Nina Mehta
–This text refers to an out of print or unavailable edition of this title.
From Library Journal
In light of recent international financial crises (in Asia, Russia, Brazil, etc.), calls to overhaul global financial authorities such as the International Monetary Fund and the World Bank in order to create a new international “financial architecture” have proliferated. Eatwell (Queen’s Coll., Cambridge) and Taylor (The New School)–two well-known economists–join the fray here, advocating the creation of a more powerful regulatory agency, the World Financial Authority. In seven sections, exploring foreign exchange rates, investment risk, and market volatility, they carefully build their case. They argue that global economic problems will continue and that there must be some sort of “global safety net” to resolve them before they get out of hand. Although their argument is timely, their language is sometimes overly technical and their proposal ultimately untenable. One wonders, however, who would control such a supranational organization and how it would be paid for. Still, this idea has legs: similar calls for financial intervention have been made recently, most notably by George Soros in The Crisis of Global Capitalism (PublicAffairs: Perseus, 1999). Suitable for larger academic libraries.
-Richard S. Drezen, News Research Ctr., “Washington Post,” Washington, DC
Copyright 2000 Reed Business Information, Inc.
–This text refers to an out of print or unavailable edition of this title.